On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, B. Richardson wrote:
> squid
>
> -
> Barrett Richardson rabtter@orion.aye.net
Squid request response time for slow clients? Squid request response time
with fast clients? Squid disk response time for hits? Squid disk response
time for cachable misses? Squid disk space usage? Squid memory usage?
In other words, what is the metric you are optimizing and how will 4KB pages
affect it? In most cases, there will be a tradeoff. It is not 100% obvious
[to me] that 8KB disk page is worse in all respects... Please specify the
metric or explain why 8KB pages are worse for everything we do.
> On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, B. Richardson wrote:
> >
> > > I am theorizing that if a large proportion of files are 4k or less,
> > > then 4k is a better choice for block size than 8k.
> >
> > What are you trying to optimize?
> >
> > Alex.
Received on Mon Jul 20 1998 - 19:42:55 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:41:12 MST