Or for it to crash. It still does that pretty well, and unexpectedly.
Squid 1.2 and reliability are not yet synonymous. Soon, but not yet.
D
Michael Pelletier wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 May 1998, Toens Bueker wrote:
>
> > 1.2 is the best bet here, I guess.
> > You can find out about your disk-performance by doing some
> > bonnie-runs with files bigger than your RAM.
> >
> > The seeks/second should tell you something ...
>
> Has 1.2's cache format been frozen yet? Last I knew, if you ran 1.2
> you had to be prepared to lose you cache contents when the database
> format changed.
>
> -Mike Pelletier.
-- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GAT d- s++: a C++++$ UL++++B+++S+++C++H++U++V+++$ P+++$ L+++ E- W+++(--)$ N++ w++$>--- t+ 5++ X+() R+ tv b++++ DI+++ e- h-@ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------Received on Tue May 26 1998 - 10:33:53 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:40:20 MST