Re: Is squid unable to handle the load?

From: Dancer <dancer@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 03:27:20 +1000

Or for it to crash. It still does that pretty well, and unexpectedly.
Squid 1.2 and reliability are not yet synonymous. Soon, but not yet.

D

Michael Pelletier wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 May 1998, Toens Bueker wrote:
>
> > 1.2 is the best bet here, I guess.
> > You can find out about your disk-performance by doing some
> > bonnie-runs with files bigger than your RAM.
> >
> > The seeks/second should tell you something ...
>
> Has 1.2's cache format been frozen yet? Last I knew, if you ran 1.2
> you had to be prepared to lose you cache contents when the database
> format changed.
>
> -Mike Pelletier.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GAT d- s++: a C++++$ UL++++B+++S+++C++H++U++V+++$ P+++$ L+++ E-
W+++(--)$ N++ w++$>--- t+ 5++ X+() R+ tv b++++ DI+++ e- h-@ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Received on Tue May 26 1998 - 10:33:53 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:40:20 MST