Not necessarily. Does the object have a set/get cookie in it? Does it
contain words found in the cache_stoplist? Is it marked 'pragma:
no-cache', or 'cache-control: private' or 'cache-control: no-store'?
Does it have a backdated expiry? Is it being asked for with any pragmas,
or cache-controls?
All these things might tell squid not to cache, or to ignore a cached
copy.
It depends very much on the object.
D
Steven Sporen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can someone explain why when I hit an object on get using my parent cache,
> my local cache doesn't store it. ie. It pulls it down from the parent again??
>
> Have I configured something wrong?
>
> Cheers
> Steve
>
> www.elab.co.za | webmaster@elab.co.za
-- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GAT d- s++: a C++++$ UL++++B+++S+++C++H++U++V+++$ P+++$ L+++ E- W+++(--)$ N++ w++$>--- t+ 5++ X+() R+ tv b++++ DI+++ e- h-@ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------Received on Sat Apr 25 1998 - 04:02:14 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:39:57 MST