At 19:49 26.03.98 +0100, sascha schnitzler wrote:
>Subnet with a netmask of 255.255.255.127
That's not a sensible netmask! It puts 31 bits in the network part and
only one bit in the host part, so you have 2^1-2 = zero usable addresses
in it. What's more, the host part is somewhere in the middle instead of
the end, which is very unusual to say the least. Are you sure your
correct netmask isn't something like 255.255.255.128?
-- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: Tilman.Schmidt@sema.de (office) Sema Group GmbH tilman@schmidt.bn.uunet.de (private) Koeln, GermanyReceived on Thu Mar 26 1998 - 23:51:30 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:39:28 MST