>the cachemgr.c code seems to have 3/4 of whats needed. the unimplemented
>REMOVE function for instance, takes a url as an argument. I can see that
>it would work to display that url if in the cache. The idea to use the
>hash on the name is to bypass having to compute that inside the cache but
>if the cost saving is too low to be worth it, then it would be simple to
>just get the object.
if you are going to add it into cachemgr, do it in the latest
1.2 beta's cachemgr.
cachemgr has undergone significant recoding - its internals are
now nothing like the old squid-1.1 and pre-1.2.beta15's.
cheers,
lincoln.
Received on Thu Mar 19 1998 - 17:44:52 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:39:25 MST