Re: Transparent?

From: Ming Lu <mlu@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 19:41:04 -0500 (EST)

That was the problem. So far I did not have any problem to implemete the
transoarent proxy with port 80, but not anything else, the only thing I
see is to tweak the router to translate the port # from 80 to something
else...

_ming

On Sat, 21 Feb 1998, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

->Ming Lu wrote:
->
->> Has anyone here ever implemented transparent proxy (or cache, whatever)
->> with port #s other than 80?
->
->The problem is that you really can't tell that it is HTTP traffic unless
->it is port 80. Port 80 is the only registered HTTP port.
->
->If you are talking about transparent proxy for other protocols, then it
->is a completely different issue and requires other software than Squid,
->but in principle it is the same (many other protocols are however far
->more complex to proxy than HTTP).
->
->---
->Henrik Nordström
->

============================================================================
Ming Lu Email: Ming.Lu@GlobalOne.net
Network Tech Consulting Engineer Phone: 703-689-5290 (w)
Engineering Division 703-855-4194 (m)
Global One Telecommunications, LLT. 703-689-6575 (f)
============================================================================
"Do not pay attention to every word people say, or you may hear your
 servant cursing you ---- for you know in your heart that many times you
 yourself have cursed others."
Received on Sat Feb 21 1998 - 16:40:37 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:38:56 MST