To answer my own question: No
Last week I did a quick comparison of the speed of Squid.NOVM.9 and
Squid.NOVM.20, which seemed to show the old squid was faster, but
as Alex Rousskov (and others) pointed out:
>1) Do not use mean for average response time; it is virtually meaningless.
>Use median instead. 
>
>2) A distribution of response time rather than single median is better, of
>course.
>
>3) Measure it for several days, not 10,000 transactions.
So I did some longer term measurements, using medians instead of average
access time, and there was no appreciable difference in speed.  Here
are the results for three days with each version of Squid:
               TCP_HIT  #Requests       TCP_MISS  #Requests
Squid.NOVM.9
               314 msecs  194,602       1391 msecs  193,178
               455 msecs  251,170       1958 msecs  194,129
               374 msecs  236,287       1648 msecs  178,613
Squid.NOVM.20
               352 msecs  174,072       1642 msecs  165,815
               382 msecs  227,845       1744 msecs  190,925
               327 msecs  224,076       1475 msecs  179,361
-- Earl Fogel Computing Services phone: (306) 966-4861 University of Saskatchewan email: earl.fogel@usask.caReceived on Fri Feb 13 1998 - 17:03:36 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:38:53 MST