Re: CONNECT_FAIL problem

Hmm, my squid.conf file had http_anonymizer off commented out,
regardless, I turned it off and still the same thing. One thing I have
noticed is that I also cannot reach one of my local servers.

The configuration of that server is Apache 1.2.5 on FreeBSD also. Is
there any known incompatibilities with this version of Apache?

My squid access.log shows no sign of me attempting to connect to the hosts
in question, it only shows me the ERR_CONNECT_FAIL message. My local host
access.log also reports no attempt at connection from my proxy.

How effective is the "client -m PURGE http://blahblahblah/" command? That
doesnt seem to have any effect either.

Ben

--
.Ben Couldrey                |   IIS Group Pty. Ltd.
.Technical Manager           |   TEL: +613 95250922.
.http://ben.webnet.com.au/   |   FAX: +613 95250260.
----------------------------------------------------
The box said "Windows 95, Windows NT 4.0, or better".
              So I installed FreeBSD.
On Thu, 29 Jan 1998, Dancer wrote:
>Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 14:32:35 +1000
>From: Dancer <dancer@brisnet.org.au>
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
>To: ben@webnet.com.au, Squid Users <squid-users@webnet.com.au>
>Subject: Re: CONNECT_FAIL problem
>
>Hmm. If they're doing something funky with security, as someone else suggested,
>maybe there are problems with the anonymizer. What do you have it set to? Ours is
>'off'.
>
>D
>
>
>Ben Couldrey wrote:
>
>> I can connect fine without using the cache in my browser, I can even
>> telnet localhost 3128 and retrieve it that way - but the damn thing wont
>> load in my browsers.  I'm running 1.1.11 on FreeBSD 2.2.2 with pretty
>> standard refresh rules, expiries and acl's.  Im stumped for answers...
>>
>> Ta,
>> Ben
>>
>> --
>> .Ben Couldrey                |   IIS Group Pty. Ltd.
>> .Technical Manager           |   TEL: +613 95250922.
>> .http://ben.webnet.com.au/   |   FAX: +613 95250260.
>> ----------------------------------------------------
>> The box said "Windows 95, Windows NT 4.0, or better".
>>               So I installed FreeBSD.
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 1998, Dancer wrote:
>>
>> >Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 12:55:32 +1000
>> >From: Dancer <dancer@brisnet.org.au>
>> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I)
>> >Subject: Re: CONNECT_FAIL problem
>> >
>> >Fine here, too.
>> >
>> >ERR_CONNECT_FAIL means: The connection was refused (the webserver wasn't
>> >running) or timed out (the webserver wasn't routable to (unreachable))
>> >
>> >Can you telnet to port 80 on either of those addresses from your proxy box?
>> >
>> >D
>> >
>> >Malcolm B.J. Garbutt wrote:
>> >
>> >> All works fine here
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, 29 Jan 1998, Ben Couldrey wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi
>> >> >
>> >> > I've been having a few problems with certain domains not being accessed
>> >> > and was wondering if anybody else had problems.  The domains are
>> >> >
>> >> > http://www.wizard-systems.com.au/ and
>> >> > http://www.paritech.com.au/
>> >> >
>> >> > All I get from the cache.log file is ERR_CONNECT_FAIL or something to that
>> >> > effect.  Is there a FAQ entry somewhere that I can read myself?
>> >> >
>> >> > TIA,
>> >> > Ben
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > .Ben Couldrey                |   IIS Group Pty. Ltd.
>> >> > .Technical Manager           |   TEL: +613 95250922.
>> >> > .http://ben.webnet.com.au/   |   FAX: +613 95250260.
>> >> > ----------------------------------------------------
>> >> > The box said "Windows 95, Windows NT 4.0, or better".
>> >> >               So I installed FreeBSD.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _________________________________________________________
>> >> Malcolm Garbutt
>> >> Network Operations-
>> >> OZLAND.NET      MILDURA.NET     MURRAY.NET
>> >>
>> >> Office Ph.   03 50 212 991      Office Fax  03 50 212 932
>> >> Emergency Ph.  018 596 150
>> >>
>> >>             .....Bringing the World to You......
>> >> _________________________________________________________
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >Did you read the documentation AND the FAQ?
>> >If not, I'll probably still answer your question, but my patience will
>> >be limited, and you take the risk of sarcasm and ridicule.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>--
>Did you read the documentation AND the FAQ?
>If not, I'll probably still answer your question, but my patience will
>be limited, and you take the risk of sarcasm and ridicule.
>
>
>