That's what I had always thought, but last night a dark confusion came over
me, and I had to ask. Thanks :)
D
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Dancer wrote:
>
> > HOWEVER, this is not a good idea if the file is cached under
> > it's original (pre-redirection) name. Only if it is cached
> > under it's new (post-redirection name).
>
> I it is cached under the redirected name. If it wasn't then it would not
> be much point in using a redirector for the original purpose of
> redirecting a mirrored site to more one local mirror instead of 10
> different mirrors around the world.
>
> The flow is something like this:
> 1. Read & parse request
> 2. Access control
> 3. Redirection
> 4. Start fetch (or swapin on a hit)
> 5. When we know that the object can be cached (based on request and
> response headers), then the cachekey is set.
>
> ---
> Henrik Nordström
> Sparetime Squid Hacker
-- Note to evil sorcerers and mad scientists: don't ever, ever summon powerful demons or rip holes in the fabric of space and time. It's never a good idea. ICQ UIN: 3225440Received on Tue Jan 06 1998 - 07:21:51 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:38:19 MST