> include: System maintenance, the short delay while doing a '-k
> reconfigure', log rotation, and the periodic shutdown (to tidy up memory
> usage)..not to mention the occasional fault that causes the box to
I reboot every friday. Prior to that and any reconfigurations
we change the dns to point to the machine were squid was initially
developed , wait until all connections are on the other machine
and have full access to the main proxie , once reconfigured
rebooted , the dns is changed back , not one user should
notice , and if they do , they are not using the correct
dns or they using the ip , wich is not given out by us.
Squid's performance is most satisfactory , plus it doubles
as a tucows mirror. The alternative is paying for a commercial
product , that works , but takes a lot of time to set up
and maintain , with the added advantage of "hacking" the
code to suit your specific needs , and the convenience of
accessing it without having to walk to the ops room and plug
in a monitor every time. Taking the performance of linux
in general , It's a bonus thats it's free. The service
of linux is the envy of many commercial developers out there.
Another quick point , is there any settings , kernel configs
that apply to a .3 sec int delay. Because we have good ping
response , but a lot of proxie stalls , with no apparent server load.
I just put it down to packet loss.
Many regards
Ps. Spread the gospel , register at counter.li.org (Linux user/
machine count. 53000 so far since nov 7)
--Daniel Schroder
Networld
http://livewire.new.co.za (F) 419 3212
mailto:daniel@new.co.za (T) 419 4430
#linux (IRC) see www.zanet.org.za
sms/mobile +2782 950 7747
On Fri, 7 Nov 1997, Scott Donovan wrote:
> >> Lately, I've been encountering a loss-of-confidence in the proxying
> >> system whenever it becomes unavailable for any reason. Such reasons
> >> include: System maintenance, the short delay while doing a '-k
> >> reconfigure', log rotation, and the periodic shutdown (to tidy up memory
> >> usage)..not to mention the occasional fault that causes the box to
> >> become unavailable (particularly infrequent, but such things _do_
> >> happen).
>
> Honestly, If you are using squid in a production environment, if possible
> apply appropriate rules. Run 2 squids as peers as the top of your
> hierarchy, and ensure as complete a coverage as possible of an proxy.pac
> that will allow load ballancing and redundancy, that way you can do your
> reconfigs/rolling upgrades etc.
>
> A hack is great, but it doesn't solve the "problem"..
>
Received on Fri Nov 07 1997 - 00:25:12 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:37:28 MST