Re: HIT rate first level Web cache compared to Top-level Web cac

From: Adam Neat <adamneat@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 18:15:14 +0000

> >
> > When I look at the statistics of a Desire/Web-caching partner, it seems
> > to be the way around... The HIT-rate of the "Second level cache" (the
> > Top-level Cache) is much higher (abount 50% in March) then the HIT-rate
> > of a First level Web caching-server (on an average32% during the same
> > period)??
> >
> > can this be true or am I mistaken ??
>
> A couple of ideas:
>
> - first, note that 50% is very close to the optimal cache hit rate.

Hello

How are you able to get such high hit rates? We have 3 proxy servers running
wiht Squid 1.1.11 and we only get between 12% and 18% hit rates!

What are we doing wrong?

Adam
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| IPAX Systems - Melbourne Australia * IPAX Head Office: (03) 9236-0528 |
| Adam Neat * National NOC: (03) 9887-1984 |
| National Systems Manager * IPAX FAX: (03) 9801-8533 |
| Mobile: 0418-348-187 * IPAX Postal: GPO BOX 94A |
| E-Mail: adamneat@ipax.com.au * Melbourne, Vic |
| http://www.ipax.com.au * Australia 3001 |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Received on Tue Sep 02 1997 - 01:20:35 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:36:54 MST