Re: Netscape 4 ?

From: Malcolm B.J. Garbutt <mgarbutt@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 12:08:33 +1000 (EST)

On Thu, 31 Jul 1997, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> A little warning on this.

What ?? NOW A WARNING [:-(

> If enabling this patch, then there is no way
> to enforce a refresh if a bad/outdated page gets cached and the dates
> get out of sync.
>
> What hits me is that this is most likely a bug/design glitch and not a
> intended feature in Netscape 4.. Their intent is most likely to ignore
> local cache and not all caches, but using general code it slips
> throught.
>
> --
> Henrik Nordström
>
> Duane Wessels wrote:
>
> > This patch is designed to have the following effects
> >
> > * if the request includes both 'no-cache' and 'If-Modified-Since'
> > the 'no-cache' is simply ignored
> >
> > * if the request includes only 'no-cache' then Squid
> > makes an 'If-Modified-Since' request out the other side.
> >
>

_________________________________________________________
Malcolm Garbutt
Network Operations-
OZLAND.NET MILDURA.NET MURRAY.NET

Office Ph. 03 50 212 991 Office Fax 03 50 212 932
Emergency Ph. 018 596 150

            .....Bringing the World to You......
_________________________________________________________
Received on Wed Jul 30 1997 - 18:02:50 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:35:52 MST