And netscape's going to guess low, in any case - they want to sell more
servers. :)
I don't know that measuring by clients is particularly useful - it's
more a combination of clients, bandwidth, congestion of the link (more
congestion == slower transfers == more transfers hanging around)
Anthony
>>> Adrian Havill wrote
> I realize Squid is (supposably) faster than Netscape's Proxy (and orders
> of magnitude faster than CERN's), but does anybody have a figure as to
> what the upper limit (in clients) is for Squid for acceptable
> performance?
Received on Wed Feb 05 1997 - 20:13:30 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:34:23 MST