Re: New cache relationship - spouse?

Peter Marelas wrote:
>
> > The issue really is getting the maximum number of unique objects in
> > multiple tightly coupled caches. The current cache relationships do
> > not allow this.
> >
> > Bandwidth costs us megabucks, disk and processing power is cheap by
> > comparison. Think US prices times at least 10 sometimes 20 (no kidding).
>
> In that case wouldnt you want both caches to hold objects, even if they are
> duplicated on both caches? To save those $$$ when in fact one of the caches
> does go down.

Assuming both caches will be up more than they are down, more objects
means less cost.

Cheers, Craig
Received on Mon Nov 18 1996 - 13:02:46 MST