Andreas Strotmann wrote:
>
> On Oct 25, 15:16, Andrew Brennan wrote:
> > Subject: hit rates ...
> > Ok - I've seen this for a while and somehow I don't believe that my
> hit
> > rate can be this bad. :^)
> >
> > Cachemgr.cgi's utilization report has 0.32 for HTTP objects. Is this
> > 32% or 0.32% ?? And I suppose people will ask why I even try if it's
> > 0.32% ...
>
> 32%. But don't trust that number (I don't). My own log analysis script
> consistently reports hit rates > 50% while cachemgr tells me it's only
> 35%.
I have the inverse problem!
cachemgr.cgi reports hit rates of .42 ( 42% ) but pwebstats reckons it's
only 20% !
Which one do I trust?
Steve Green
Received on Tue Oct 29 1996 - 16:36:49 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:24 MST