Re: [PATCH] validate -n parameter value

From: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:32:19 +0200

LGTM, only:
Are the first two columns really necessary in the statement
::Parser::Tokenizer tok
?

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> Update the service_name global to an SBuf and use Tokenizer to validate
> the -n argument is a pure alphanumeric.
>
> Amos

-- 
    Francesco

Received on Mon Jun 16 2014 - 09:32:35 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] validate -n parameter value"
Previous message: Tsantilas Christos: "Re: [PATCH 6/8] reconfiguration leaks: SSL certificate context cache"
In reply to: Amos Jeffries: "[PATCH] validate -n parameter value"
Next in thread: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] validate -n parameter value"
Reply: Amos Jeffries: "Re: [PATCH] validate -n parameter value"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 16 2014 - 12:00:11 MDT