On 15/02/2014 6:47 a.m., Francesco Chemolli wrote:
>
> On 14 Feb 2014, at 13:24, Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> Just to kick this further along. I've put together the proposal in patch
>> form.
>>
>> Anyone game to test the SMP support is working properly with "-M
>> foreground" when this is applied?
>>
>> I'm also beginning to think we are needing to add getopts_long() support
>> and just use "--foreground" for the no-daemon mode.
>> If the attached patch actually works regardign SMP and we agree on the
>> user-visible bit I'm happy to add that update for the command line and
>> commit.
>
> I'd also add an option to keep the current -N behaviour, such as uniproc, single-proc, one-process or something similar.
> What do you think?
With the proposed patch -N is still working as before. But with an added
deprecation notice to encourage all those who just want foreground
semantics without the debug limits to use the new way.
Amos
Received on Mon Feb 17 2014 - 07:03:37 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 17 2014 - 12:00:13 MST