On 02/11/2014 03:28 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 2014-02-12 06:19, Kinkie wrote:
>> I suspect that HttpHeader.cc needs some love. Has anyone already
>> thought about this topic or should I prepare a proposal? I'd like to
>> share design ideas before going for an implementation attempt.
> Yes there is need of polish and performance fixing. Probably not worth
> doing until after the parser-ng upgrades are done. The output from the
> parser will affect when needs storing and manipulating by that code.
I agree with Amos that parsing changes should probably be finalized (or
at least agreed upon) first. However, I would not be surprised if some
of those parsing changes will have to spill into HttpHeader as well to
avoid doing a lot of data copying.
HTH,
Alex.
Received on Tue Feb 11 2014 - 22:34:13 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Feb 12 2014 - 12:00:12 MST