On 12/30/2013 03:21 AM, Kinkie wrote:
> we have been talking about mandating c++11 some time in the next few months.
The "next few months" timeframe is not realistic IMO: There is
relatively little for Squid to gain from that requirement (without a lot
more work on our part) and there is a significant inconvenience for
folks that cannot upgrade.
For now, I suggest that we continue to do what we have been doing: If
there is a way to implement what you need without C++11, implement it
without C++11 (and add a comment suggesting a future C++11 migration).
Cheers,
Alex.
Received on Tue Dec 31 2013 - 21:40:56 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jan 01 2014 - 12:00:13 MST