Re: [PATCH] Destroy ACLs in the reverse order of creation

>> I think we really should be ref-counting these pointers to make it a bit
>> more flexible and ensure that they do not get erased while in use.
>
> Yes, of course. Refcounting would also improve the
> AclMatchedName-related code significantly. I cannot volunteer to do the
> required legwork at this time, unfortunately.
>
>
>> +0. I have no objections for this going in now while we consider the above.
>
> Will commit soon unless somebody else finds a reason not to.

Please do commit but add an XXX remembering the future us to do the
refcount legwork.
Thanks!

-- 
    /kinkie