On 28/09/2013 3:18 a.m., Tsantilas Christos wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 08:23 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> Using approach (2) with flexible RE delimiter, we could write
>>
>> acl foo url_regex /ends[) (]/
>> or
>> acl foo url_regex {ends[) (]}
>> or
>> acl foo url_regex @ends[) (]@
>>
>> and it will all work without double escaping.
>
>
> Alex, in the "Revised approach to fixing configuration syntax" mail
> thread you are proposing to use "regex::" prefix for regular
> expressions. This is required for grammar consistency.
> This is means that the regex should like :
>
> acl foo url_regex regex::/ends[) (]/
> or
> acl foo url_regex regex::{ends[) (]}
> or
> acl foo url_regex regex::@ends[) (]@
Okay Alex I think we can agree on that flexible-delimiter syntax to
avoid escaping.
I also agree with that regex:: prefix.
Is there anything else we have been disagreeing on?
Amos
Received on Fri Sep 27 2013 - 15:40:02 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Sep 27 2013 - 12:00:11 MDT