On 07/25/2013 12:53 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> I have been playing with the idea of locking these into memory cache, or
> using a dedicated memory area just for them to avoid the speed issues.
I do not think we should do that complex optimization, at least not
until _after_ we are done with fully supporting Vary functionality.
Correctly maintaining a specialized [shared] memory cache for x-vary
objects is difficult. Moreover, that special cache becomes an
unnecessary burden if our caching code optimizes access to popular
objects. I would rather see us focus on the latter optimization because
it would help with all transactions, not just Vary.
$0.02,
Alex.
Received on Thu Jul 25 2013 - 15:56:50 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 26 2013 - 12:01:00 MDT