Re: Do we have any connection with RH squid maintainer?

tis 2013-06-04 klockan 11:48 +0300 skrev Eliezer Croitoru:
> I was wondering about the major bugs that was found in 3.1 that RH and
> therefor CentOS doesn't have in their RPMS.

Double negation there?

Have you tried tiling a bug report in redhat bugzilla? It's the best
contact method available for reaching RHEL package maintainers.

> If we had someone that is connected to RH squid maintainer we could push
> some fixes to the enterprise rings and get more feedback.

If I am not mistaken the RHEL Squid maintainer is the same who is main
maintainer in Fedora: Michal Luscon <mluscon_at_redhat.com>, and if not I
am sure Michal known who is maintainin the RHEL package.

Jiri Skala have moved on to other tasks I think.

> I am not suggesting using them as Guinna pigs but puss squid newer
> versions to the major vendors.

RHEL upgrade policy prevents any Guinna pigs. But also prevents most bug
fixes..

> So who do we care about? or we don't care about anyone?

Define "care about".

Our main concern is the source distribution moving forward. We do not
have resources to keep maintaining a frozen stable branch for many years
as needed by RHEL and the like.

But we should try to keep a clean upgrade path.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue Jun 04 2013 - 21:47:12 MDT