Re: boolean bit fields

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:32:58 +1300

On 25/01/2013 6:12 a.m., Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 01/24/2013 09:27 AM, Kinkie wrote:
>
>> From what I understand, the current consensus is to use :1'ed bools, right?
> I hope the consensus is to use full bools (because they are simpler and
> often faster) except where memory footprint of the structure is both
> affected _and_ important (a rare case). In those rare cases, use bool:1.
>
> HTH,
>
> Alex.
>

Yes full bools. I retract my audit requests.

Amos
Received on Fri Jan 25 2013 - 01:33:06 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 25 2013 - 12:00:09 MST