Re: [RFC] Handle ACLs that are neither denied nor allowed

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 21:17:13 +0200

tis 2012-05-08 klockan 12:41 -0600 skrev Alex Rousskov:
> This thread started with a suggestion to add "reason" information to
> the allow_t enum type so that ACL check answers can be split into
> primary yes/no/other return code and supplementary code-specific
> information.

There is a number similar directives

tcp_outgoing_*
clientside_*
adaptation_meta

maybe more.

Do your approach fit for these as well?

Regards
Henrik
Received on Tue May 08 2012 - 19:17:19 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 09 2012 - 12:00:04 MDT