On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:46:22 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> On 09/11/2011 09:22 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
>> IMO its passed the audit for merge.
>
>
> Should I commit a good old patch or do a bzr merge with the 3p2-rock
> branch on lp?
>
> * Patch. Less noise, less structure: No low-quality commit messages
> and
> no intermediate, later-redone, or merged-from-trunk changes. No good
> way
> to isolate Rock Store from Core commits.
>
> * Merge. More information, more structure: Detailed commit messages
> for
> most important changes that led to the final state. Also isolates
> most
> Rock Store changes from Core changes if one looks beyond the
> top-level
> merge commit.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alex.
Up to you.
I'm inclined to say merge. It compacts the old commit messages anyway
in the changeset and asks for a new message describing the branch
overview so the summary you posted in the audit should be suitable with
nothing actually lost.
Amos
Received on Tue Sep 13 2011 - 01:31:08 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 13 2011 - 12:00:03 MDT