Re: [patch] Fix some errors building with clang++ trunk.

On Aug 12, 2011, at 15:08, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> On 12/08/11 23:34, Kinkie wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Gnu++0x looks good, but then what about non-gnu compilers? Oh WHY do
>> they have to be strict ANSI? I curse thee, standards committee!
>>
>
> One of the benefits we gain is eyeballs on all these problems and a reason to document all the weirdness.
>
> FWIW; I skipped gnu++0x after reading the list of features they supported which are still experimental or were rejected from the spec.
>
> The tests detect both of them properly, but so far only enables the -std set so we only get the pieces which are officially accepted.
>

Do not get hung up on c++0x, it's the same problem with c++98 vs. gnu++98.

The C++ standards do not accept long long.

-- 
Pawel