fre 2011-06-03 klockan 12:01 +0200 skrev Kinkie:
> Hi all,
> The purge tool seems to be showing its age; among other things, it
> is a mess to have it build on Windows, and even doing so would be
> kludgy.
What makes it so?
> What are your opinions about refreshing/rewriting it? If so, which of
> its features would it be worth to maintain, and which to abandon?
> for instance, I'm not sure it'd be worth to keep squid.conf file
> parsing, parallel scanning, talking to squid.
Ideally the tool wouldn't even be needed imho.
> It could remain as an ufs cache dump/clear tool, with cache_dir(s)
> passed as command line arguments.
Good idea.
> Opinions?
cache search & dump functionality perhaps should be built-in?
Regarding purging then there is other ideas on that, such as keeping a
timestamped "purge list" which invalidates cache hits from before.
Benefit is that purge operations is instant, not requiring a whole cache
scan. Downside is that we somehow need (should) to keep track of a
timestamp when an cached object last was evaulated against the purge
list for performance reasons.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Jun 03 2011 - 10:17:22 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jun 03 2011 - 12:00:04 MDT