Re: [squid-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: squid_ldap_group against nested groups/Ous

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 01:31:31 +0000

On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:34:48 -0000, "Markus Moeller"
<huaraz_at_moeller.plus.com> wrote:
> Here is a patch for the squid trunk.
>
> Markus
>

The patch seems not to have come through.

Amos

> "Amos Jeffries" <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:4CDF2628.2050601_at_treenet.co.nz...
>> On 13/11/10 22:30, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On 05.11.2010 21:01, Markus Moeller wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I get the same successful results on 64 bit FreeBSD 8.0.
>>>>
>>>> $ uname -a
>>>> FreeBSD freebsd-80-64.freebsd.home 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE
#0:
>>>> Sat Nov 21 15:02:08 UTC 2009
>>>> root_at_mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>>>>
>>>> $ ldd squid_kerb_ldap
>>>> squid_kerb_ldap:
>>>> libgssapi.so.10 => /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.10 (0x800652000)
>>>> libheimntlm.so.10 => /usr/lib/libheimntlm.so.10 (0x80075b000)
>>>> libkrb5.so.10 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.10 (0x800860000)
>>>> libhx509.so.10 => /usr/lib/libhx509.so.10 (0x8009cd000)
>>>> libcom_err.so.5 => /usr/lib/libcom_err.so.5 (0x800b0c000)
>>>> libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x800c0e000)
>>>> libasn1.so.10 => /usr/lib/libasn1.so.10 (0x800ea6000)
>>>> libroken.so.10 => /usr/lib/libroken.so.10 (0x801025000)
>>>> libcrypt.so.5 => /lib/libcrypt.so.5 (0x801136000)
>>>> libldap-2.4.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/libldap-2.4.so.7 (0x80124f000)
>>>> liblber-2.4.so.7 => /usr/local/lib/liblber-2.4.so.7 (0x801390000)
>>>> libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80149d000)
>>>> libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x8016d7000)
>>>> libssl.so.6 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.6 (0x8017ef000)
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible that you have another kerberos package installed ? How
>>>> does your ldd look ? I installed a standard freebsd 8.0 84 bit plus
>>>>
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/8.0-RELEASE/packages/net/openldap-sasl-client-2.4.18.tbz
>>>> for ldap with sasl support.
>>>>
>>> First of all, sorry for a delayed answer, I'm not of that kind of
>>> persons that ask for help and never read answers. I had a couple of
>>> harsh weeks with crashes and late working. :)
>>>
>>> Yes, I have multiple krb5 installations on machines where the build
>>> didn't succeed due to incompatible types, you were right. Also I have
>>> updated the production proxy that was on FreeBSD 7.2 to 8.1 (and had a
>>> harsh week due to wonderful em(4) issue, fixed in -STABLE), but now
the
>>> building on this machine is fine, except one warning that can be
easily
>>> fixed by removing -Werror (once again, why -Werror ?).
>>>
>>> If you're interested the warning is about:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include -g -O2
-Wall
>>> -Wno-unknown-pragmas -Wextra -Wcomment -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align
>>> -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
>>> -Wmissing-declarations -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wshadow -MT
>>> support_group.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/support_group.Tpo -c -o
>>> support_group.o support_group.c
>>> support_group.c: In function 'utf8dup':
>>> support_group.c:43: warning: declaration of 'dup' shadows a global
>>> declaration
>>> /usr/include/unistd.h:330: warning: shadowed declaration is here
>>> [...]
>>
>> Because warnings indicate problems as much as errors. Ignoring them in
>> leads to major problems later. We depend on people like yourself
>> reporting
>> them at the warning stage before that happens.
>>
>> In this case its warning about some confusion between a system dup()
and
>> a
>> second local one which may differ in some critical way on some systems.
>>
>> Thanks for the report.
>>
>> Amos
>> --
>> Please be using
>> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.9
>> Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.3
>>
Received on Mon Nov 15 2010 - 01:31:35 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Nov 15 2010 - 12:00:04 MST