Re: [PATCH] HTTP Compliance: improve age calculation

On 09/29/2010 02:20 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> How does this interact with<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/29>?

I do not know for sure (even though I think I wrote that ticket
precursor!), but I suspect more fixes will be needed to address ticket
#29. Glad that RFC bug is going to be fixed though -- I did not get very
optimistic responses when it was initially reported...

In general, we are focusing on RFC 2616 compliance for now, unless
HTTPbis can reduce the amount of work needed.

> While you're at it, any thoughts about<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/212>?

It sounds like you are proposing a general "the path to origin is all
HTTP/1.1" test. If yes, it should be documented separately and used
throughout the specs as needed, IMHO.

Thank you,

Alex.

> On 28/09/2010, at 3:01 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>
>> HTTP Compliance: improve entity age calculation.
>>
>> Account for response delay in entity age calculation as described in RFC
>> 2616 section 13.2.3.
>>
>> Co-Advisor test cases:
>> test_case/rfc2616/ageCalc-none-7-none
>> test_case/rfc2616/ageCalc-5400-4-5
>>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
>
Received on Wed Sep 29 2010 - 21:38:42 MDT