Re: Bug 2957 - only-if-cached shouldn't count when we're not caching

Ah, no -- the cache ACL has to be explicitly applied, e.g.,

cache deny all

Cheers,

On 17/06/2010, at 12:58 PM, Robert Collins wrote:

> Well it sounds totally fine in principle; I'm wondering (without
> reading the patch) how you define 'we are not caching' - just no
> cachedirs ? That excludes mem-only caching (or perhaps thats not
> supported now).
>
> -Rob

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com