Re: [PATCH] icap_oldest_service_failure option

From: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:43:42 +0100

> But then I am also the kind of guy who grasps what our delay pool
> settings do... which is a very frequent question.

Hm.. do you think we need better documentation so we can just answer to RTFM?
Or is it something which can't be covered by documentaiton, or too
many different cases to be able to synthetize?

-- 
    /kinkie

Received on Mon Feb 22 2010 - 08:43:50 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kinkie: "Re: [PATCH] immortal helpers"
Previous message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: SMP: process-specific options"
In reply to: Henrik Nordstr�m: "Re: [PATCH] icap_oldest_service_failure option"
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstr�m: "Re: [PATCH] icap_oldest_service_failure option"
Reply: Henrik Nordstr�m: "Re: [PATCH] icap_oldest_service_failure option"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 22 2010 - 12:00:07 MST