FWIW, I have an XSLT stylesheet that can format the results pleasantly; it could be a starting point for something automated.
On 29/01/2010, at 12:34 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 22:49 -0700, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>> c) Co-Advisor currently only tests MUST-level requirements. Old Robert's
>>> checklist contained some SHOULD-level requirements as well. I see that
>>> Sheet1 on the spreadsheet has SHOULDs. Are we kind of ignoring them (and
>>> Sheet1) for now, until all MUSTs on Sheet2 are satisfied?
>>>
>>> d) I do not know who created the spreadsheet. Whoever it was, thank you!
>>> Is there a script that takes Co-Advisor results and produces a
>>> spreadsheet column for cut-and-pasting?
>> It looks nice. It might be based on the xls spreadsheet I made, but I
>> don't know ;)
>> I would not worry about SHOULD's until the MUSTs are done (but if a
>> SHOULD is in reach while doing a MUST, doing it would be good).
>> -Rob
>
> Spreadsheet by me. Item format + naming by the Co-Advisor authors. Data by Y! testing + me for the estimated column.
>
> I tried to base it on yours Rob for a historical view of the 2.x support. But the item naming and crossover was too different and too much work to be reliable and easy. half-sorry ;)
>
> Alex: the current form is effectively a XLS dump cross-test of the Co-Advisor results. Plus manual estimations for the "guess" column.
>
> I've forgotten what was on the Sheet2. So yes it's missed a few rounds of updates.
>
> Amos
> --
> Please be using
> Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE21
> Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.15
-- Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.comReceived on Thu Jan 28 2010 - 23:42:30 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jan 29 2010 - 12:00:07 MST