Henrik Nordström wrote:
> This is one of those odd bug reports which users encounter in the field
> when running a packaged Squid (Fedora).
>
> If Squid is build with IPv6 support enabled (which Fedora 12 Squid is),
> but the host for some reason do not have IPv6 support enabled then the
> binary will fail with "comm_open: socket failure: (97) Address family
> not supported by protocol"
>
> Question is, do we consider this a bug or just a misconfigured host?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548903
>
>
> Note that Fedora 12 by default do have IPv6 support enabled in even if
> unconfigured. Special host configuration is needed to completely disable
> IPv6 support triggering this issue (see Fedora bug report above).
>
> But I can imagine other distributions may give the user an easy option
> to fully disable IPv6 support if they want.
>
> Users compiling their own kernels may also run into this issue.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
This is another side of the missing split-stack support.
The particular DNS issues he mentions are, I believe, resolved by the
split-stack support currently in 3.HEAD. However, there are issues
further down in forwarding still to be resolved before I'm happy
back-porting it.
What was that old 3.0 saying? "Real soon now".
Meanwhile there is a perfectly working solution with --disable-ipv6 and
rebuild Squid.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE7 or 3.0.STABLE21 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.15Received on Mon Jan 18 2010 - 13:04:20 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jan 19 2010 - 12:00:06 MST