Re: [PATCH] Cache-Control overwriting hack

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> hnordstrom has voted tweak.
> Status is now: Semi-approved
> Comment:
> Better to turn it the other way around. Add a new header to be used as
> substitute for Cache-Control by the reverse proxy.
>
> For details, see:
> http://bundlebuggy.aaronbentley.com/project/squid/request/%3CE8FE3C35-0CBA-4272-9194-DEF885267638%40semihuman.com%3E
>
> Project: Squid

That would be the ESI Surrogate-Control: header Robert brought up.

As indicated to earlier. Implementing Surrogate-Control: for
reverse-proxy mode would be acceptable. Adding new headers to do the
same purpose in worse ways is not.

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE6 or 3.0.STABLE18
   Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.13