ons 2009-08-19 klockan 19:20 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom:
> ons 2009-08-19 klockan 16:15 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:
> > Henrik, this is the new memory-promotion patch dying.
>
> Does not look like the patch, but I will look into it regardless.
In fact it was... For some reason I tried to optimize the caller which
exposed this fragile point of the cache_mem maintenance when dealing
with "private" objects.
Still thinks the assert should go, but that's another day when the
cache_mem maintenance is looked over, the current code has room for
improvement in both style & performance.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Wed Aug 19 2009 - 20:34:09 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 20 2009 - 12:00:06 MDT