Re: Stateful helpers cleanup (big axe)

On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:07 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> Looking at the stateful helpers code I noticed we still have the
> deferred concept, even if it's not used at all.
>
> As part of preparing the code for concurrent helper protocol for
> NTLM/Negotiate I propose dropping the deferred support, and possibly the
> helper resets as well as there isn't really any distinction between
> reset and release when there is no deferred requests.

There's still going to be the concept of 'tcp connection X needs auth
helper Y to send its next step on'; this is essentially deferred
requests. I'm fine with a big axe; I'd just hate to see you delete
everything just to bring it back again.

-Rob