On Fri, 17 Jul 2009, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> 
> Um, okay. Have a read of this alternate Spec and see if you can stil 
> find the security hole you are woried about:
I don't understand in what way it substantially differs from what the spec 
says today. There are minor differences in wording, but other than that, 
and other than the requirement that two TCP connections be established to 
port 80 when using port 80 instead of just one, it seems equivalent. Could 
you elaborate on what the important difference you had in mind is?
-- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Fri Jul 17 2009 - 09:20:58 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 17 2009 - 12:00:05 MDT