On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > If you don't already, it would be good to explain the risks of using
> > it over port 80 in the document, and perhaps do something stronger to
> > discourage such use. Likewise, a note about the dual protocol port not
> > being a preferred setup would be helpful, if only in making it go down
> > a bit smoother in the IETF.
>
> I've tried to do this. Please let me know if you think the wording
> should be stronger; I wasn't exactly sure how much hand-holding was
> appropriate. (The text is in the new "Establishing a connection"
> section.)
Actually I'm getting an error message from the upload tool (something
about the tool being disabled for a few days or something?), so in the
meantime you can see the text here:
-- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Thu Jul 16 2009 - 23:55:25 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Jul 17 2009 - 12:00:05 MDT