Re: More patches for squid2-HEAD

On 23/04/2009, at 2:11 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:

>>
>> On 21/04/2009, at 10:44 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>>> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2643
>>
>> Amos, any thoughts about the revised patch ("monitor-direct")?
>>
>
> I still don't agree that this is anything close to the Right Way to
> do it.
> Easy, yes, but thats all. Please hold off until Henrik can get a
> good look
> at it and voice his opinion.

OK. Henrik?

FWIW, I think this is the right way to do it -- a flag saying that
monitoring should be direct is backwards-compatible, easy for users to
understand, and addresses the use case.

>>>>> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2631
>>
>> Amos, does this make sense now?
>>
>>
>>>>> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2632
>>
>> I think we cleared up confusion in discussion; applying unless I hear
>> otherwise.
>>
>
> Well, Henrik may have other opinions since he has to manage it. But
> I'm no
> longer objecting to it as a temporary measure.

Assuming that this applies to both. H?

--
Mark Nottingham       mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com