I agree. My impression was that it's pretty specific to their
requirements, not a good general solution.
On 17/12/2008, at 4:17 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> ons 2008-12-17 klockan 16:12 -0500 skrev Adrian Chadd:
>
>> So is there any reason whatsoever that it can't be committed to
>> Squid-2.HEAD as-is, and at least backported (but not committed to
>> start with) to squid-2.7?
>
> I am a bit uneasy about adding features known to be flawed in design.
> Once the header format is added it becomes hard to change.
>
> Sorry, don't remember the details right now what was flawed. See
> archives for earlier discussion.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
-- Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.comReceived on Sat Dec 20 2008 - 21:13:59 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Dec 22 2008 - 12:00:03 MST