Kinkie wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Alex Rousskov
> <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> [...]
>
>> I do not know whether folks discussing personal and business issues on
>> IRC would welcome a searchable archive, so proceed with caution.
>>
>> Thank you,
>
> I agree. Hence the RFC.
> A wiki-based archive has a plus on a fixed-text one is that any wiki
> editor can strip any unwanted logs.
>
> Thanks for the feedback, I'm waiting for more before doing anything.
I think we should do it when we hold meetings. But not as a matter of
routine.
While it would be nice to see whats being discussed while I'm asleep.
Most of what goes through there has been 1-1 help or small
collaborations to get something fixed fast. Not exactly important
information, or the result has soon come out in email anyway.
#squid also often has a higher level of confidential info than
squid-users, which people may not appreciate being published long-term.
-0. I don't think its worth the trouble moderation would require.
Amos
-- Please be using Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE5 or 3.0.STABLE10 Current Beta Squid 3.1.0.1Received on Wed Oct 29 2008 - 23:24:27 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Oct 30 2008 - 12:00:07 MDT