On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 09:24 +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 13:43 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> >
> > I can probably fix it myself, but it would help a lot if somebody
> > could
> > document (briefly!) the overall purpose of deferred reads and the
> > exact
> > purposes of these two nearly identical methods (one brief description
> > for each, please):
>
> From memory...
>
> > DeferredReadManager::kickReads(int const count)
>
> do up to count reads that have been deferred
>
> > DeferredReadManager::flushReads()
>
> do all reads
Is the order in which reads are "done" or "kicked" important? Does it
have to be FIFO?
Thanks,
Alex.
Received on Thu Sep 25 2008 - 23:42:35 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Sep 26 2008 - 12:00:05 MDT