Re: [RFC] 3.1 branching

> I only have one question: how well does that release numbering model match
> the other OSS projects using the same numbering system? We don't want to set
> our own method and meaning when there is already a common way to get
> confused with.

No standard that I know of - timestamps are quite common for
prerelease, and some projects also use them for post-release.
The closest thing, having been adopted by some other projets, has been
Linux's (now abandoned) "odd minor releases are devel, even minor
releases are stable".

-- 
 /kinkie