On lör, 2008-08-16 at 02:16 +1200, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> Henrik, Guido;
>
> The parser in 3.0 is just different enough from 3.1 for me to be
> unsure whether the behavior would be the same. Does this need to be
> back-ported?
The 3.0 parser looks fine to me. It was just HEAD that was twisted..
Regards
Henrik
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 16 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT