Well I'm still going through the process of planning out what changes
need to happen.
I know what changes need to happen long-term but this project doesn't
have that sort of scope..
Adrian
2008/8/8 Mark Nottingham <mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com>:
> You said you were doing it :)
>
>
> On 08/08/2008, at 4:40 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> Way to dob me in!
>>
>>
>> Adrian
>>
>> 2008/8/8 Mark Nottingham <mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com>:
>>>
>>> I took at stab at:
>>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/RequestBuffering
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22/07/2008, at 4:40 PM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's not a bug. A feature request in the wiki is more appropriate.
>>>>
>>>> wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Henrik
>>>>
>>>> On mån, 2008-07-21 at 17:50 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I couldn't find an open bug for this, so I opened
>>>>> http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2420
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/06/2008, at 3:29 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On ons, 2008-06-11 at 12:51 +0300, Mikko Kettunen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, I read something about this on squid-users list, there seems
>>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>> 8kB buffer for this if I understood right.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The buffer is bigger than that. But not unlimited.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The big change needed is that there currently isn't anything delaying
>>>>>> forwarding of the request headers until sufficient amount of the
>>>>>> request
>>>>>> body has been buffered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Henrik
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham mnot_at_yahoo-inc.com
>
>
>
Received on Fri Aug 08 2008 - 07:59:30 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 08 2008 - 12:00:05 MDT