Ok. Well, the intent of the patch makes sense to me; I'd have to stare
at it a bit to make sure the patch is the right way to do it.
Henrik?
Adrian
2008/8/5 Alexander V. Lukyanov <lav_at_netis.ru>:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 02:25:34PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Hm, so whats the behaviour without this patch?
>
> rebuild is done in foreground as expected, but cleanup goes in background
> in parallel with client requests. The patch fixes the second part - the cleanup.
>
> --
> Alexander.
>
>
Received on Tue Aug 05 2008 - 06:45:14 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Aug 08 2008 - 12:00:05 MDT