Re: RFC: delayed Logdaemon port merge

Hi Amos,

At 04.20 26/06/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>Guido Serassio wrote:
> > Hi Amos,
> >
> > At 13.40 25/06/2008, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >>> Priorities are fine, but having some actual long-term directions to
> >>> fit these features into a roadmap will make much more sense.
> >>> Personally, I think you guys should consider fixing or reverting
> >>> whatever stuff is in Squid-3.HEAD right this second which causes
> >>> instability and release Squid-3.1.
> >>
> >> :-) Oh I'd love too...
> >>
> >> There's nothing in there right now thats inherently unstable
> >> (excepting ESI and COSS from 3.0). Just a few bugs on the
> >> high-priority track.
> >
> > Please also add the Windows support to the list, still totally broken
> > and still without any usable VCS on Windows .....
>
>Which list? the RoadMap?

Not working features list.

>I wouldn't call the windows support unstable (or destabilizing to the
>rest of squid). I'd call it mostly missing already.

Correct, remove Windows from Squid 3 supported platforms.

Regards

Guido

-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l. - Microsoft Certified Partner
Via Lucia Savarino, 1 10098 - Rivoli (TO) - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.9530135 Fax. : +39.011.9781115
Email: guido.serassio_at_acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Received on Thu Jun 26 2008 - 06:05:20 MDT