2008/6/25 Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>:
>> Personally, I think you guys should consider fixing or reverting
>> whatever stuff is in Squid-3.HEAD right this second which causes
>> instability and release Squid-3.1.
>
> :-) Oh I'd love too...
>
> There's nothing in there right now thats inherently unstable (excepting ESI
> and COSS from 3.0). Just a few bugs on the high-priority track.
What about the fd assertion bug that some have triggered? Thats been
around since the AsyncCalls stuff was integrated.
> The holdup is us still sticking with the deadline-based management we
> implemented in the last round of Adrian-negotiations if you recall.
Well, thats because you guys won't back out stuff which causes
instability with no timeframe on fixing it. :)
Adrian
Received on Wed Jun 25 2008 - 11:54:49 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jun 25 2008 - 12:00:08 MDT