Re: header-to-header latency

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:05:38 +0200

On fre, 2008-06-06 at 15:38 +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Logging the client-side request done point is an option, but it's of
> limited value, because most requests don't have a body, and as
> mentioned, the server can start sending the response before the
> request is done. Not against it, just don't see *much* value.

What is of value is the delay between client request done and response
headers start, with a filter to ignore negative entries where the server
responds "too early" (or alternatively switch to measure request header
done to response header starts in such cases)

Regards
Henrik
Received on Fri Jun 06 2008 - 22:05:42 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Jun 07 2008 - 12:00:04 MDT